Name :- Mansi Upadhyay
Roll no :- 18
Semester :- 3
Year :- 2019-20
Paper no :- 12 (English Language Teaching-1 )
Assignment Topic :- Explanesion of Task Based language learning
Roll no :- 18
Semester :- 3
Year :- 2019-20
Paper no :- 12 (English Language Teaching-1 )
Assignment Topic :- Explanesion of Task Based language learning
E-Mail :- mansiupadhyay06@gmail.com
Submitted to :- Department of English Maharaja Krishnakumar sinhji Bhavnagar University.
Submitted to :- Department of English Maharaja Krishnakumar sinhji Bhavnagar University.
Words :- 1515
Introduction :-
Introduction :-
Task based language
learning (TBL) focus on the use of the authentic language and on asking
students do meaningful tasks using the target language. Such task can include
visiting a doctor, conducting and interview, or Teacher and student or calling customer
service for help. Most approaches to language teaching can be described as
‘Form-based’. Such approaches analyse the language into an inventory of forms
which can then be presented to the learner and practiced as a series of
discrete items. J. Wills(1996) defines a task as an activity ‘where the target
language used by the learner for a communicative purpose in order to achieve an
outcome’. Here the notion of meaning is subsumed in ‘Outcome’.
What is a TBL ?
Task based language
learning.
Task based language learning
(TBL) also known as Task based language Teaching (TBLT), or task based
instruction (TBI) focus on the use of authentic language and on asking students
do meaningful tasks using the target students do meaningful tasks using the
target language. Such task can include visiting a doctor, conducting an
interview, or calling customer service for help.
Assessment
is primarily based on task outcome in other words the appropriate
completion of real world tasks rather than on accuracy of prescribed language
forms. This TBL especially. Popular for developing target language
fluency and student confidence as such task based language learning can be
considered a branch of “Communicative language teaching”.
Definition of Task :-
1). A task involves a primary
focus on meaning.
2). A task has some kind of
‘Gap’ (Prabhu identified the main types as informal gap,
reasoning gap, and opinion gap.)
3).The participants choose the
linguistic resources needed to complete the task.
4).A task has a clearly defined
non linguistic outcome.
Prabhu (1987) identified four
broad task types:
1 information Gap
2 Reasoning Gap
3 Problem solving
4 Opining Gap
Let’s see one by one,
Information Gap activity:-
which involves a transfer of given information from one person to another or
from one place to another generally calling for decoding or encoding of
information from or in to language.
One
examples is pair work in which each member of the pair has a part of the total
information. The activity often involves selection of relevant information as
well as, and learners may have to meet criteria of completeness and Correctness
in making the transfer.
2. Resoning Gap :-
Reasoning gap activity,
which involves deriving some new information from given information though
processes of inference, deduction, practical reasoning. or a perception of
relationship or patterns.
One
example is working out a teacher’s timetable on the basis of given class
timetables.
The
activity necessarily involves comprehending and conveying information, as in
information-gap activity, but the information to be conveyed is not identical
with that intially comprenced. There is a piece of reasoning which connects the
two.
Opinion Gap :-
Opinion gap activity which
involves identifying and articulating a personal preference, feeling, or
attitude in response to a given situation One example is story completion
another is taking part in the discussion of social issue. The activity may
involve using factual information and formulating arguments to justify one’s
opinion, but there is no objective procedure for demonstrating outcomes as
right or wrong, and no reason to expect the same outcome from different
individuals or on different occasions.
According
to Jane Wills Task based language learning TBL consists of the pre-task cycle,
and the language focus.
The components of a Task are:-
1. Goals and objectives.
2. Input.
3. Activities.
4. Teacher role.
5. Learner role.
6. Setting.
Principle of Task Based Learning :-
- Learners require
exposure to the real and varied language of speakers of the target language.
- Learners
must be exposed to and use the kind of language that they want and need for
their own interest or purposes.
- Learners
must be provided with opportunities for unrehearsed and meaningful language use
in purposeful interaction where they take informed risks, make choices, and
negotiate meaning while seeking solution to genuine queries.
- Teacher
Ensure that activities are interconnected and organized with clearly specified
objectives and promote the desire to learn.
- Teacher
should elicit self-correction enable personalized feedback, and consider
learners individual developing language systems.
- Teacher
must set activities for learners that help them notice language forms;
induction/ discovery is preferable to deduction/ presentation; teachers should
instruction form in the context of activities where is primary.
- The
whole language listening, speaking, Reading, and writing should be integrated.
- Teachers
evaluate learners in a formative manner and in terms of the process of
achieving a goal; learners need to evaluate their own performance and progress.
One
feature of TBL, therefore, is the learners carrying out a task are free to use
any language they can to achieve the outcome: language forms are not prescribed
in advance.
The
task based approaches, therefore, language development is prompted by language
use, with the study of language form playing a secondary role. Recent research
however, suggests that while communicative language form if acquisition is to
maximally efficient.
Skehan (1996), e.g. argues that
unless we encourage a focus on form, learners will develop more effective
strategies for achieving communicative goals without an accompanying
development of exchange meanings in spite of the shortcoming of their language
as a result they to exchange meanings in spite of the shortcomings
of their language. As a result they may fossilize at a relatively low level of
language development.
Skehan(1992)
suggest that learning is prompted by the need to communicate, but argues that
learning will be more efficient if:
1. There is a need to focus on
accuracy within a task-based methodology.
2. There is a critical focus on
language form within the task-based cycle.
The challenge for TBL,
therefore, is to devise a methodology which affords learners the freedom to
engage natural learning processes in the creation of a meaning systems, but
which incentives to ‘restructure’ their system in the light of language input.
An
approach similar in some ways to Prabhu’s is put forward by Breen
1987 and Candlin 1987 in their advocacy of a process syllabus. Breen and
candlin agree with prabhu in they see the basic unit of syllabus design and
classroom methodology as an activity of some kind.
- The
role of the teacher is not to determine unilaterally how learning will be
organized and sequenced, but to consult learners and help them realize their
own learning plan.
- Prabhu’s
procedural approach deliberately avoids all focus on language. Students
operating with the process syllabus, however, may choose for themselves to
focus explicitly on language form.
TBL
like CLT rests on road principles rather than precise recommendations or
perceptions. The second principle is that learning will be effective only if it
is related closely to language use and involves relating form and meaning.
J.Wills
1996 offers another classification of tasks which subsumes the above types and
as a generative pedagogic tool. She suggests that we first draw up series of
topics suited to our learners. She then identifies a number of operations,
based on chosen comparing; problem solving; sharing personal experiences;
creative tasks.
The
need for a focus on form within a task-based methodology may be met in part by
manipulating the circumstances of communication in the classroom. Tasks carried
out orally in manipulating the circumstances of communication in the classroom.
Task which involve a presentation to the class as a whole, or the preparation
of written output, demand a higher level of accuracy. this is in line with
natural language use. We are more conscious of language form in public
presentation than in private use. Wills and Wills 1987-96 offer a detailed
rationale for these procedures, a frame work involving a pre-task phase
followed by a task-planning report cycle, in which learners move from pair
discussion of task to a public report of their findings.
It
is important that teacher question for the principles and procedures which
inform TBL. Formal research may identify and refine questions to do with
classroom practice and provide experimental findings which are indicative of
answers to some of those questions, but it is important to test these finding
through critical observation of classroom practice. And recently start to
digital era and this time task are different role of education like email, blog
task, online discussion task, etc… role of the task based learning.
Conclusion :-
TBL
represents an attempt to harness natural processes. But it also seems that
these process and provide language focus activities based on
consciousness-raising which will support these processes. The crucial
challenges for TBL, therefore, are to do with design and sequencing of tasks,
and the determination of how best to encourage learners to focus on language
form in a way which prompt language development while, at the same time,
recognizing that there is no direct.
Thank You